![]() The AMD one is actually a smidge more accurate than the Nvidia model, covering 87% of the sRGB colour gamut as opposed to 85%. In terms of image quality, however, they're far from identical. Each one also has a 1920x1080 resolution and a 144Hz refresh rate, and they each support their own variable refresh rate tech (G-Sync on the Nvidia model and FreeSync on the AMD one) for super-smooth gaming and minimal screen tearing. Both are 17.3in behemoths in terms of size and overall weight, and are very much intended as desktop replacement laptops rather than something svelte and portable like the Asus ROG Zephyrus S. Which one will triumph? Let's find out.įirst, let's look at what each laptop has in common. After all, both laptops are roughly the same price in the US right now ( $1898 for the Nvidia one and $1829 for the AMD), while the AMD version in the UK is around £300 cheaper, going for £1499 as opposed to £1769 for the Nvidia jobber. ![]() ![]() The former has one of AMD's Radeon RX Vega 56 chips while the latter comes with a full-fat GTX 1070.īut rather than review each one individually, I thought I'd do something a bit different this time and get both models in and pit them against each other to see which one you should actually buy. Case in point: Acer's Predator Helios 500 laptop, which is available in both AMD and Nvidia graphics flavours. That's mostly because AMD haven't really bothered with gaming laptops for the last couple of years, but that's slowly starting to change.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |